Interpreter of Maladies

To define post-modernism, would to be post-modern. It’s definition is mysterious and intellectually stimulating. Only through self-interpretation, can we find truth, as the interpreter believes it is. “Interpreter of Maladies” written by Jhumpa Lahiri, exemplifies what in my mind, defines a post-modern work, as quite literally we see Mrs. Das searching for interpretation from Mr. Kapasi of her infidelity to potentially compare with her own individualistic understanding. 

In approaching Mr. Kapasi in conversation, we see all three characters journey further into their own realities, or “interpretations” of their circumstances. Mr. Das, depicted as an American tourist, and weak father, remains unknowing of his wife’s infidelity and the bastard status of whom he thinks is his son, Bobby. Mr. Kapasi interprets the situation between himself and Mrs. Das, as an intimate and potentially growing relationship, as her recognition of his career ignites a destructive imagination. Lastly, Mrs. Das is simply searching for a fathering figure to interpret her infidelity, and believes Mr. Kapasi can fill that role. 

Like any human relationship, the relationship between Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das is defined by the interpretation. Where Mr. Kapasi believes Mrs. Das is looking for a romantic escape, Mrs. Das simply seeks to empty her mind of guilt. Primarily the story is seen through the perspective of Mr. Kapasi, however as the audience we are able to understand the perspectives of Mr. and Mrs. Das as well. Mr. Kapasi sees a connection to the Das’ relationship with his own failed marriage, and views the behavior of the Das’ as irregular. “Mr. and Mrs. Das behaved like an older brother and sister, not parents. It seemed that they were in charge of the children only for the day; it was hard to believe they were regularly responsible for anything other than themselves.” (Lahiri, 49). Overall, “Interpreter of Maladies” is a unique post-modern piece that almost as if scientific, weaves the numerous interpretations and perspectives together into an interesting conflict of understanding.